New York House Histories
  • Home
  • About
  • Research Services
  • Projects
  • Contact
  • NYHH Blog

Shakespeare, Puck, and the Drama of Preservation

12/14/2011

1 Comment

 
_ The architecture of New York City buildings can often put me in a trance. I find the detail work mesmerizing, so when I look for a building to write about I have to admit that I will choose one which has interesting artwork over one which has a longer history. But how often does a building have gorgeous architecture, a fascinating history, and a story that springs from Shakespeare? For those of us who appreciate historic landmarks and have a romance with Shakespeare and drama, the Puck Building in lower Manhattan on Lafayette Street proves irresistible.

Picture
The Puck Building, 1897 as it is being braced during razing.
(The World, 30 September 1897)
__PUCK HISTORY

The Puck Building, named after the famous character in Shakespeare’s Midsummer Night’s Dream, was built between 1885-86 by Jacob Ottoman. The crenelations and eyebrows over the multiple arched windows of the German Romanesque Revival styled building are as enchanting as the character “Puck.” Henry Bunner the editor of the weekly magazine, “Puck” which began about 1876, later moved to the building which became its namesake. The publication sparkled with political wit, poked fun at those in the limelight and claims to have helped develop the careers of world renowned figures including Mark Twain and Thomas Edison. The building was once the world’s largest center for printing and lithography. But it suffered the pain of tragedy and change from the start. Shortly after completion in 1886 it was threatened with having forty feet shaved off to make way for Elm Street (now Lafayette) which otherwise would have run straight through the building. A few years later several of the top floors were gutted by fire. Through the years it has been the scene of payroll robberies, elevator accidents, and the suicide of an unidentified man who hung himself on the roof just near the Puck statue. Shortly after the building’s tenth birthday, pedestrians feared for “life and limb” as bricks fell randomly during the razing of two-thirds of the building. Of even greater concern was the possibility that the building would collapse. In the early 1900s the weekly magazine became defunct after Hearst Publications, the new owner, disbanded it. The building, after having been closed for many years, was re-opened in 1983 and currently houses commercial space as well ballrooms for events such as weddings, meetings, trade shows, and dinners.

SHAKESPEARE DRAMA IN THE 21ST CENTURY

The Puck Building is susceptible to the winds of change once again. Jared Kushner, (aka Ivanka Trump’s husband) awaits the decision of the board on the morning of November 15th. This is the third time he has applied to alter the existing structure with a rooftop addition that bears little resemblance to the original structure adorned with beautiful crenelations, arches, and detail work. During the original presentation several months prior, Jared passionately extolled his love for the building and his architect interjected the story of “Puck” for a dramatic affect.  I imagine that the Kushner team was hoping that three times would be the charm, as the saying goes, but the results of the hearing proved that rule fallible. Despite the architect’s gentle modification of the structure, the board was not impressed enough to accept what they considered a massive, visible addition. They were even less affected by the waving of arms and wiggling of fingers in an expressive story-telling fashion by Sherida Paulsen, the architect, as she described how her father had given her a book of the Shakespearean comedy. They remained focused on the enormity and visibility of the addition with the concern that more attention would be drawn to the new attachment rather than to the building itself. One board member commented that while the story of Puck and its relation to the design is interesting, the average person walking on the street would not be thinking about that when they saw the monstrosity atop the building. “Perhaps I am romantically challenged,” he added. After questions were answered and deliberation among the members was completed with no action taken, a parting remark of, “See you…again…soon,” indicates that this is not the end of the Puck Building saga.
Picture
Above: Proposed rooftop structure

Right: The Puck Building as of 13 December 2011
Picture
1 Comment

    NYHH Blog

    Blogging about the New York historical skyline, genealogical & biographical house histories.

    For unique stories about buildings currently on the market and resources for property owners and real estate agents see Building Chronicles

    Archives

    February 2016
    February 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    May 2014
    May 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    October 2011

    Categories

    All
    259 Broadway
    281 Stuyvesant
    401 Fifth Avenue
    Brooklyn
    Chester Court
    Columbia University
    Commercial Building
    Crain's New York Business
    Edward C. Moore
    English Heritage
    Family Legacy
    Flatbush
    Genealogy
    Gideon F. T. Reed
    Historic Designation
    Historic District
    House Histories
    J. Lewis Ellis
    John B. Young
    Joseph Griffin
    Landmark
    Landmark Preservation Commission
    Landmarks
    London
    McKim
    Mead & White
    Municipal Art Society
    New York City
    New York City Nyc
    New York Landmarks Conservancy
    Nyc
    Nyc Landmarks Preservation Commission
    Peter J. Collins
    Preservation
    Puck Building
    Real Estate
    REBNY
    Renovation
    Restoration
    Stuyvesant Heights
    Tiffany
    Tiffany & Co
    Townhouse
    Vanderbilt
    YIMBY

    RSS Feed

Copyright © 2011-2016 Legacy Roots, L.L.C.